![]() |
Ethical Consumption, Talk about the good work of consumers who make choices based on the sustainability of supply chains, along with the companies that respond to these ethical demands. |
Is Un-Sustainability Evolutionary?
Dane Pflueger | Sunday 15th February 2009|
There is a theory, advanced by Dr Willian Rees, that modern evolutionary trajectory favors the development and growth of unsustainable social-cultural factors. He argues that in the same way that evolution selects out maladaptive biological traits, they too select out maladaptive social and cultural traits. Unfortunately for the human race, the tenants of consumption, production, and growth have become central to our cultural value system as our ability to do these things at exponentially larger scales. The centrality of these inherently unsustainable values in our modern social system has favored the evolutionary bias against any competing beliefs and values. This puts us in a seemingly intractable situation. As we increasingly need to think and act more sustainable, our evolutionary system favors the development of increasingly unsustainable values and beliefs. It's a pretty bleak story. |
![]() |
Dane Pflueger 15 February 2009 Hi Martin, I actually heard this theory from William Rees on a University of British Columbia podcast series called "Imagining a Sustainable Future". I am not sure how to link to it but it is available through iStore free podcasts. He is one of the founders of the 'ecological footprint' concept and wrote a book on it in 1996, "Our Ecological Footprint". I can't find any articles by him specifically on the evolutionary theory account that he gives in the podcast. If I do find one, I'll let you know.
|
![]() |
Martin Smith 15 February 2009 Dane, do you have a link to more of Willian Rees writing, articles? Or does he have a website?
|
![]() ![]() |
Sara Wolcott 15 February 2009 i like your focus on values - and your implicit recognition that it is what values that we choose to live by - that matters more than almost anything else. I've worked with a theory of values development that i find quite useful, which suggests that not only have we chosen unsustainable values (consumption, economic growth, production, etc.), but why they are unsustainable - because they are means-values, not ends-values. That is, they ultimately are for another goal. We consume to stay healthy. we want to grow economically in order to stay out of poverty/lift others out of poverty. we produce that we might live. the goal-values, there, is health and well-being (including not being in dire poverty). It is when we forget that the means-values (ie, consumption) is not a goal in itself (shopping for the sake of shopping) that we have problems. Profit is good- but (and here others may disagree with me) it is not the ultimate end-goal. Health, well-being, harmony, even peace - those are goal-values. And values that can make us happy.
|
|




I woke up this morning in a pretty bad mood. I try to reconcile my beliefs about sustainability with my lifestyle but it is always a battle. Last night was a huge battle, as I tried my best to have a cute Valentines evening with my significant other and keep my environmental footprint to a minimum. To keep a long story short, it was a mini ecological disaster but a wonderful evening with my girlfriend as always. I am normally a pretty optimistic person, but this morning I'd rather share a more sobering view of sustainability.


About the Author


