![]() |
Ethical Consumption, Talk about the good work of consumers who make choices based on the sustainability of supply chains, along with the companies that respond to these ethical demands. |
Service or product?
Pete Burden | Monday 26th January 2009
![]() I was planning to post on the topic of purchasing decisions today, when by coincidence I saw Jeremy Litchfield's interesting post on consumer responsibility. Isn't it great when things fit together like that? One aspect of taking this responsibility is whether we decide to buy services or products. I was faced with a choice over the weekend of buying a "thing" or a "service". Both served exactly the same function (to make some of my data safe). Products clearly have a quite different environmental profile from services. A product requires energy and raw materials to manufacture and transport. A service, delivered over the internet, for example, has low transportation cost. And the incremental cost of providing it may be small because of economies of scale and the fact I share the tangible components with many other people. I considered the environmental impact of both – and the service won hands-down. But I still felt myself so drawn to the "thing". A strong emotional pull that I couldn't fully locate, but I knew was real. What was this all about? The thing was nice and shiny and I could imagine it arriving and the fun of unpacking it. The service was a software download - and pretty intangible and almost "grey", in my mind. Something about “having” the thing – on my shelf, in my house – was also attractive. I guess this is the same thrill that collectors have. Not something I thought I suffered from, but I when I looked I could really experience it. There were some additional benefits to the service – the “thing” would quickly become obsolete. Whereas someone else would have the problem of ensuring the service always took advantage of the latest technological advances. And, of course, if the “thing” broke I'd be the one dealing with the problem. But I also felt some fear around the service – the idea of tying myself into a long-term contract was getting under my skin. My preference is not to load myself with financial commitments. I guess I am not alone in that, especially right now. In this case the burden of owning the "thing" seemed negligible; whereas I felt I was imprisoning myself in the service deal – probably for life. In the end, I found another way and bought neither. Hooray for a simpler life! But my point is that there are habits around this kind of purchasing decision. Perhaps my example was trivial. If we are talking about the difference between car ownership or car sharing, then yes, as Jeremy points out, we need to take responsibility. But, in my opinion, we need to do that fully: we as consumers, and also the businesses that serve us, need to become aware of these emotional and psychological factors if we are to have any collective hope of changing our behaviour. Some clever people are already looking at this – look at Live|Work's work for Streetcar, for example.
|
![]() |
Joshua Clauss 26 January 2009 I am still pretty addicted to consumerism myself, and have the same tendencies toward physical products. This kind of a change is paradigmatic, and will probably take place over generations, but that's exactly why it's important to begin considering it more now so that our kids are more open to these ecologically superior modus operandi.
|
![]() |
Pete Burden 26 January 2009 Great stuff Pete. When I started Atayne, I had the vision of turning apparel into a service as opposed to a product. This is a huge mindset shift for people, but I think someday we will get there.
|
![]() |
Jeremy Litchfield 26 January 2009 Great stuff Pete. When I started Atayne, I had the vision of turning apparel into a service as opposed to a product. This is a huge mindset shift for people, but I think someday we will get there.
|
![]() |
John Friedman 26 January 2009 What an interesting perspective you offer... I wonder if the acquisitive nature that you're describing is ingrained (we're all still hunter/gatherers) or is a reflection of the consumer culture.
In some small (and traditionally poorer) communities, people join together to purchase community-owned farm equipment. The question is is this based solely on economic necessity or is it some cultural inclination that encourages mutual ownership? Given the economic ability, do people deep down |
|






About the Author


