<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
			<rss version="2.0"
				xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
				xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
				xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
				xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
				>
			<channel><title>Social Enterprise</title><link>http://www.justmeans.com/editorials/socialenterprise/3.html</link><description>Justmeans's blogs for Social Enterprise</description><pubDate>Fri, Nov 20 21:59:53 -21600</pubDate><generator>http://www.justmeans.com</generator>
				<language>en</language>
				<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
				<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item>
													<title>Global Entrepreneurship Week</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Global-Entrepreneurship-Week/5383.html</link>
													<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:41:25 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Global-Entrepreneurship-Week/5383.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Innovators have always been heroes, whether or not the marketplace liked their inventions or immediately recognized them for their brilliance. [Think Philo Farnsworth (TV), Preston Tucker (1948 Torpedo automobile), Alexander Fleming (Penicillin) and Steve Jobs, just for starters.]

But today's entrepreneurial landscape is d [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Innovators have always been heroes, whether or not the marketplace liked their inventions or immediately recognized them for their brilliance. [Think Philo Farnsworth (TV), Preston Tucker (1948 Torpedo automobile), Alexander Fleming (Penicillin) and Steve Jobs, just for starters.]<br />
<br />
But today's entrepreneurial landscape is different. More than any other time in recent history, it is crowded with new venture ideas. Today's business and non-profit worlds favor the young and the globally conscious, and even in the most destitute corners of the world, young social innovators are more start-up savvy than ever. They're not waiting for permission to get started: the world's problems have rarely seemed so daunting.<br />
<br />
To commemorate <a href="http://www.unleashingideas.org/">Global Entrepreneurship Week</a> (#GEW), which runs this week in 85 nations [including the United States], this blog will be posting three short "Changemaker" profiles spotlighting a few of the most dynamic new social entrepreneurs using the mobile Internet today. To be sure, we profile many innovators on this blog -- regardless of what week it is. But this week and next, we'll focus on a few who are testing new ways to use new "right here, right now" mobile technologies to improve the world as we know it.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, beginning today, we'd like your input on the following question. [Consider it an informal "reader poll."]<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Who do you think is the most dynamic but as-yet unknown social entrepreneur in the world today? </strong></em><br />
<br />
Post a comment or send me an email and we'll add it to a list of "Social Entrepreneurs to Watch in 2010." We'll be compiling that list over the next month for our year-end Social Enterprise Round-Up of trends in the social enterprise space.<br />
<br />
And one more thing? With more than 25,000 different events tied to Global Entrepreneurship Week this year -- organizers are hoping to engage some 4 million participants in 88 countries -- please share your experiences from any of these events with me and your colleagues in the Justmeans community.<br />
<br />
It's your week. Let us hear what you're up to.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Green Isn't Everything</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Green-Isn-t-Everything/5372.html</link>
													<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:02:17 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Green-Isn-t-Everything/5372.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[It's critical that consumers and employees hold businesses accountable to their social marketing hype, says Adam Werbach, the former Sierra Club President-turned-sustainability chief for advertising giant Saatchi and Saatchi. And "we've got to get out of this thinking that says sustainability is only about being green," he  [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">It's critical that consumers and employees hold businesses accountable to their social marketing hype, says Adam Werbach, the former Sierra Club President-turned-sustainability chief for advertising giant Saatchi and Saatchi. And "we've got to get out of this thinking that says sustainability is only about being green," he told attendees of this year's Net Impact Conference, a national gathering of social innovators at Cornell University.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Werbach, the CEO of Saatchi and Saatchi S -- the marketing icon's new sustainability arm -- is also the author of the new book, <em>Strategy for Sustainability</em>, in which he urges the business world to consider long-term profitability and transparency and not just environmentalism in its sustainability goals going forward. At 23, Werbach was named to head the Sierra Club; he was its youngest-ever president. Now 35, Werbach -- who sold his global PR and marketing firm, Act Now, to Saatchi last year -- says he has expanded his definition of sustainability to include  "internal innovation" by companies in every aspect of how they make, buy, sell, and produce their products.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Just as key now as being green, Werbach says, is how closely aligned companies are with their employees and customers -- and how outspoken these stakeholders are in making sure the companies they work for or patronize walk the talk. "The financial meltdown marked the beginning of a new relationship between companies and their customers," Werbach said Saturday, "... and acting on the right values across the board is critical."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Werbach, who says he's been "an activist all [his] life but [nonprofit] environmentalism wasn't moving fast enough," told conferees that the Great Recession has been a bit like a wildfire, burning away the weakest underbrush so that new growth may replace it. Out of last year's financial meltdown, he says, will come "whole new breeds of companies" focused on long-term profitability by being transparent about their operations, more engaged with their customers, and more networked with social issues [including environmentalism] that interest them.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<br />
According to Werbach, corporate America is at a tipping point -- a time where every company faces a "great chance for change." He cited Coke and Pepsi, which -- when pushed by employees -- decided to lower the lights in their vending machines, saving millions of dollars for their companies and signaling energy savings as a value to their workers and customers. Werbach says a growing number of companies are creating and following what he calls North Star Goals, social objectives akin to the Six Sigma quality objectives of the 1980s and 90s, but instead aimed at tackling poverty, climate change, and public health challenges.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Werbach says these goals, to be effective, must be: actionable by every employee; core to the business objectives of the company; achievable in 10-15 years, and clear and simple enough to inspire employees and customers, alike. Werbach says that Toyota, for example, has set a North Star goal, which is "to create cars that never crash and clean the air as they drive." Or consider Starbucks Coffee, which has as its North Star goal the idea that "local is important." The company is moving toward buying all of its coffee as fair-trade and making all of its cups recyclable and re-usable, Werbach says. Meanwhile, Wal-mart's North Star goals, Werbach says, involve having only sustainable products in its stores and 100 percent renewable energy powering the company, plus zero waste. "It is green-washing or local-washing?" Werbach asked his audience. "Let's see how they do it."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">To be sure, Werbach said, some companies "cheat" when it comes to marketing themselves for sustainability. But that's why, he said, everyone in the audience "needs to be an activist. The corporate world needs this infusion of employee and customer activism right now because the business world is on the verge of change," he said. "American consumers and businesses seem ready to make changes to save the planet but our challenge as activists now is to give companies something to do."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Werbach">Werbach</a> urged customers and employees to make their views known to store managers and company executives, and to hold companies strictly accountable to their stated objectives on sustainability, corporate responsibility, and social innovation. "We all need to be reminded that more socially responsible behavior is not just important to the planet," Werbach said, "but important to companies to survive in a marketplace where customers have never before had so many options."</p><br />
<br />
<!--EndFragment--><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></span></p><br />
<br />
<!--EndFragment-->]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>School for Change-makers</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/School-for-Change-makers/5239.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:14:53 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/School-for-Change-makers/5239.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Last Saturday, I had the privilege of being a "pitch coach" at dosomething.org's Social Action Boot Camp in New York City. I was one of 60 official "old persons" [people in business over 30] invited by the organization's CEO [and chief old person] Nancy Lublin, to help coach some of the 14- to 22-year-old participants on th [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Template>Normal</o:Template> <o:Revision>0</o:Revision> <o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime> <o:Pages>1</o:Pages> <o:Words>804</o:Words> <o:Characters>4103</o:Characters> <o:Lines>91</o:Lines> <o:Paragraphs>27</o:Paragraphs> <o:CharactersWithSpaces>5631</o:CharactersWithSpaces> <o:Version>11.773</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG /> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:DoNotShowRevisions /> <w:DoNotPrintRevisions /> <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery> <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery> <w:UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin /> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--StartFragment--><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Last Saturday, I had the privilege of being a "pitch coach" at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Something">dosomething.org</a>'s <a href="http://www.dosomething.org/training/video">Social Action Boot Camp</a> in New York City. I was one of 60 official "old persons" [people in business over 30] invited by the organization's CEO [and chief old person] Nancy Lublin, to help coach some of the 14- to 22-year-old participants on their pitches to start and sustain a cause. Their training for the day included how to write a not-for-profit business plan and how to build a successful Web site for less than $10, as well as how to brand and market their causes and start a social enterprise.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I and my fellow coaches, which included VH1 President Tom Calderone and Deutsch Bank Managing Director Steven Beck, didn't participate until the final hours; the young entrepreneurs practiced the funding pitches they'd created earlier in the day and then tried them out on us. It was our job to critique them. Each of the best three pitches were later awarded $1,000.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">I consider myself a tough listener; as a journalist and a media executive, I'm pitched daily by nonprofits and social enterprises. But these kids? Most of them had me at hello, and not simply because of their idealism. Their fearless pragmatism and their clarity of purpose, process, and design distinguished them.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">One pitch I heard was from<span> </span>Liz Hesterberg, a junior at Eastern Connecticut State University, where she is working to create a nonprofit to raise awareness of child soldiers and the war in Uganda, as well as raise money for a youth center to be built there. Another pitch came from Rebecca Kantar, a senior at Newton North High School in Massachusetts and a founding member of Minga, a teen-run, not-for-profit group working to ease the global child sex trade by educating teens worldwide.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">But the real star of the day was Nancy Lublin, Do Something's CEO and lead entrepreneur--the person spearheading these boot camps. "Young people possess the energy, creativity and motivation to rock the world," Lublin told me and the other coaches she assembled last Saturday. "We're here to help them do it."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">I first met Lublin in 2006, at a cover shoot for a <em>Contribute Magazine</em> lead story I had assigned as <em>Contribute</em>'s Editor-in-Chief that was called "21 Under 40" - profiling 21 young social activists [including Lublin] to watch. Lublin's own story was and remains especially inspiring: Her first activist campaign, she says, was liberating the purple crayons in pre-school after one loud boy had declared them "not allowed for girls." Then, one February more than a decade ago -- when Lublin was a law student at NYU -- she remembers returning to her then-West Village apartment, only to find a $5,000 check waiting for her in her mailbox, sent to her from the estate of her great-grandfather, who had died years earlier. But Lublin, then 23, didn't spend it on herself. Instead, she used it to team up with three nuns in the Bronx to start Dress for Success, the now world-known nonprofit that collects new and gently used business suits to give to women trying to transition from welfare to work, women who often don't have suitable outfits for job interviews.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Initially, Lublin ran the organization out of her tiny student apartment while continuing to attend law school, all the while loudly recruiting donations from her friends and family. "I was a fundamentalist not-for-profit person," she told <em>Contribute</em> reporter Jesse Ellison. "I was evangelical." But when her place became overrun with donated clothes -- to the point where there was jewelry in the vegetable crisper and suits hanging from her shower rod -- Lublin knew she was really on to something. Today, Dress for Success is an international operation with 75 affiliates -- and Do Something, a nonprofit Lublin was recruited to lead in 2003, has gone from being an "old-school" nonprofit on the brink of financial collapse to becoming one of the most popular and Internet-savvy nonprofits for youth in this country.<span> </span></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">And Lublin is just getting started. By 2011, she says, her goal is that at least 2 million kids are taking action and reporting back to Do Something about their work. Judging by her past track record, Lublin will certainly make that goal. It's all about walking the talk, she says, and teaching others how to do the same.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">True to form, at the end of the day Saturday--just before the pitch session began--Lublin asked the group to recite with her Do Something's rallying cry, which goes as follows:</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em>I am not a rock star. I am not Bill Gates. </em></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em>I've never sold an Internet company. </em></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em>But I can rock change.</em></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em> And I can do something before I go to bed tonight. </em></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em>So look out world! </em></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em>I am starting now.</em></p><br />
<br />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><em><br />
</em><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">They're on their way.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">For more information on Lublin and Do Something, go to www.dosomething.org.</p><br />
<br />
<!--EndFragment-->]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Growing Change -- In the Dark</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Growing-Change-In-Dark/5278.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:47:08 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Growing-Change-In-Dark/5278.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Eben Bayer has declared war on Styrofoam - what he calls "that toxic white stuff" that can be found in the walls of your home, in coffee cups, in packaging, in your back yard and along the sides of the highway. Styrofoam, he says, takes up more space in landfills than any other type of trash.

And the famous Garbage Patch - [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Eben Bayer has declared war on Styrofoam - what he calls "that toxic white stuff" that can be found in the walls of your home, in coffee cups, in packaging, in your back yard and along the sides of the highway. Styrofoam, he says, takes up more space in landfills than any other type of trash.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">And the famous Garbage Patch -- that floating island of plastic trash in the Pacific Ocean that's bigger than Texas? It, too, contains a huge amount of ground-up Styrofoam, Bayer says -- and it's killing the birds and fish that feed on it. "Our planet's toxic addiction to plastics is poisoning our environment and our bodies," he says.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">So Bayer, the son of a Vermont farmer, and his ex-classmate, Gavin McIntyre, co-founded Ecovative Design, a new company based in Green Island, N.Y., that uses the fibers in mushroom roots and seed husks to produce a type of organically-grown material -- called "greensulate" -- that can be used as a Styrofoam replacement. [The two met as mechanical-engineering students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.]</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">But don't look for an assembly line at the 10-employee firm. Look for dark rooms instead. Ecovative grows mycelium (mushroom roots)  in a bed of agricultural by-products including buckwheat husks. After about 10-14 days, the root systems, seeded on metal panels, are baked in an oven at between 100 and 150 degrees Fahrenheit and then "harvested" for use in any number of applications. One top app, Bayer says, is called "Ecocradle" - a strong, paper-like material that has the same thermal and physical properties as Styrofoam.</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">"This material is 100 percent compostable in your own garden," Bayer says, "and for each unit of this material that we create, we release 10 times less CO2 that's in the same volume of Styrofoam and use eight times less energy."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">But Bayer isn't stopping there. To help market the product, Bayer has launched an online awareness campaign that asks people around the world to take pictures of the Styrofoam waste they see -- using their camera phones or computers -- and to email them to <a href="mailto:stop@toxicwhitestuff.com">stop@toxicwhitestuff.com</a>. Bayer plans to aggregate all such content into a Web site that he says will be the equivalent of "a loud, resounding, global 'no'" which he hopes will encourage others to come up with similarly new materials "to replace the thousands of plastics polluting the environment today."</p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">So far, Bayer's Ecocradle and "white stuff war" has earned him a new round of public attention. Bayer, Ecovative's CEO and a 2009 PopTech Fellow, just announced that Ecovative won the <a href="http://http://alturl.com/8ww8">Opportunity Green OG25</a> competition and that his "Ecocradle" is being featured as one of 100 top innovations in the December issue of <em>Popular Science</em><span style="font-style: normal;">.</span></p><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Not bad for two 24-year-olds out to grow environmental change that's sustainable.</p><br />
<br />
<!--EndFragment-->]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Slow Money: A New Movement for Social Enterprise</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Slow-Money-A-New-Movement-for-Social-Enterprise/5166.html</link>
													<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:09 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Slow-Money-A-New-Movement-for-Social-Enterprise/5166.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Woody Tasch is a man with a mission. The former venture capitalist-turned-revolutionary, as he calls himself, is the guru of "slow money" - the name Tasch gives to his philosophy that combines a passion for social enterprise with the benefits of locally-grown food. Tasch is the catalyst behind a new national campaign to per [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Woody Tasch is a man with a mission. The former venture capitalist-turned-revolutionary, as he calls himself, is the guru of "slow money" - the name Tasch gives to his philosophy that combines a passion for social enterprise with the benefits of locally-grown food. Tasch is the catalyst behind a new national campaign to persuade at least 1 million Americans to donate between $25 and $1,000 each to help create a grassroots, non-profit seed fund to support and grow local food businesses and family farms.<br />
<br />
But it's much more than healthier food that Tasch is after. He is traveling the country this fall, warning that money moves way too quickly. Billions and trillions of dollars zip around the globe, he says, as if disembodied from the people who invest it. "Investors don't know anymore where their money goes and more and more, they want to see an impact for what they give in their own lives and own communities," Tasch told a capacity crowd at New York University Thursday night. Tasch said he wants to build and test the concept of something he calls "nurture capital" - a healthier and more sustainable alternative to venture capital for funding new businesses. It's time, he says, to shorten the distance between investors and their investments. It's also time, he says, to create new economic models that deliver a return but that also put community, soil fertility, and the environment at the bottom line.<br />
<br />
"This is really paradigm-bending stuff," says Gabriel Brodbar, the director of NYU's Reynolds Program for Social Entrepreneurship. Brodbar invited Tasch to speak as part of Reynolds' fall speaker series. "Even the most traditional, free market capitalists like [philanthropist] George Soros and [National Economic Council director] Larry Summers have recently admitted in one way or another that our traditional paradigms have failed us."<br />
<br />
But Tasch is no out-of-left-field gadfly. He is chairman emeritus of Investor's Circle, the nonprofit network of angel investors, venture capitalists, foundations, and family offices that since 1992 has facilitated the flow of $130 million to 200 early-stage social enterprises dedicated to sustainability. Before that, he was the treasurer of the Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation. Tasch's slow money movement, which was officially kicked off in September during a conference in Santa Fe, is an extension of that work. Tasch also says there is "a dramatic need" now to focus time, energy, and capital on the next generation of small businesses entrepreneurs because they represent economic diversity. Also important, he says, is fixing the nation's broken food production system. "Fix it, and many other social, economic, and environmental benefits will follow," he says.<br />
<br />
"Right now, it's hard to believe that the Whole Foods Market down the street is still able to exist, given the damage we're doing to our soils, and it's hard to believe something bad is going to happen," Tasch told NYU students. "But [our food production system] isn't sustainable. It's time to slow down and start looking up close at what we are doing not just with industrial agriculture but what we're doing to ourselves on the planet in the name of sustaining our standard of living."<br />
<br />
With slow money, Tasch is taking a page from the slow food movement, the 20-year-old movement that calls on consumers to treat the act of eating less as a hurried distraction and more like a family ritual that celebrates community and takes time out to reflect upon the labor involved in growing the food that we eat. "Money should move the same way," says Tasch. "This isn't just about finance but the relationship of finance to culture."<br />
<br />
In short? Tasch wants to persuade grassroots investors to "take the power back" over their communities and start putting some of their assets into local businesses they can see and watch and [in this case] even taste. He wants them to measure growth not by numbers of dollars so much as the yield of a local crop and the health of a local community. He acknowledges that investing in sustainable local agriculture will yield below-market returns. But he says nobody will lose money; these returns, he says, will be solid - maybe a 3 percent profit or maybe 6 percent one over many years.<br />
<br />
Traditionally, Tasch says, financial markets have connected people who have extra capital with those who need it. Banks, as middlemen, invest that capital wherever they can get the greatest return for their shareholders. But now, Tasch says, the system should be re-jiggered so that investment decisions also start to take into account what's best for local communities. When small businesses borrow or get investment directly from their customers, he says, communities become stronger; societies become more humane.<br />
<br />
But the real dividend of slow money, says Tasch, is social, economic, and biological diversity. In an era of industrial agriculture, when millions of acres are planted with the same variety of corn and when millions of pigs are bred for their yield, small local farms are "the ultimate hedge fund," he says.<br />
<br />
"Genetically-modified plants and organisms [GMOs] are like [financial] derivatives," Tasch says. "GMOs are like finance scientists trying to trick the yield on a piece of land. Sure, people will say I don't know what I'm talking about, that these new GMO varieties of plants are crossbred for less risk because every wheat stalk planted is exactly the same genetically. But I don't know. I'm not alone when I say that we headed for a biological correction similar to the financial correction we just had. Why? You can't trick risk. The only way to mitigate risk is with diversity. Biological, cultural and economic diversity is the only answer for risk -- meaning lots of small-scale, diversified things of all kinds coexisting in a healthy relationship. We're talking percolation versus circulation; diversity versus monocultures, fertility versus profitability, and relationships versus transactions."<br />
<br />
So far, Tasch says, his slow money movement has 700 members, including about 50 people who have sent in $1,000 checks over the Internet and small local enterprises such as Vermont's Butterworks Farm, a $1 million annual yogurt business, as well as Let's Be Frank, a Berkeley, Calif.-based hotdog company, and Sky Vegetables and Local Harvest. At the Sante Fe slow money convention in September, there were 450 attendees from 34 states and six countries, he said. "Now we're trying to get 1 million people to sign the slow money principles and from that, build capacity."<br />
<br />
He admits that early investors may not be "big money people" but instead, small money investors who are "frustrated with the foundations system and who are frustrated as philanthropists." Says Tasch: "We must bring money back down to the Earth. It's time to restore a bit of reality back into all of our lives."<br />
<br />
For a copy of Tasch's petition of <a href="http://www.slowmoneyalliance.org/principles.html"> Slow Money principles</a>, click here. For more on Tasch's slow money philosophy, check him out on this March 2009 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3_whekB2w4">YouTube video</a>.<br />
<br />
<em></em>]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Values: How Vulnerable to Profit?</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Values-How-Vulnerable-Profit/5098.html</link>
													<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:48:29 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Values-How-Vulnerable-Profit/5098.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[There's a boom in the creation of social enterprises but there's also a debate raging among the leaders of this new field over whether the most successful new enterprises will be able to sustain all of their original core values of social good -- especially if or when these new organizations link up with or get bought by fo [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a boom in the creation of social enterprises but there's also a debate raging among the leaders of this new field over whether the most successful new enterprises will be able to sustain all of their original core values of social good -- especially if or when these new organizations link up with or get bought by for-profit firms. Gabriel Brodbar, director of New York University's Reynolds Program in Social Entrepreneurship, cites this concern as one of the more important topics facing the new field of social entrepreneurship. During a break in the recent PopTech conference for social innovation in Camden, Maine, I caught up with Brodbar; here's an edited transcript of that conversation:<br />
<br />
<strong>What do you see as the key trends facing those in the field of social enterprise this fall?</strong><br />
<br />
Within the socially entrepreneurially-focused organizations out there -- like Ashoka, StartingBloc, NYU Reynolds, Ashoka, Justmeans and others -- I think there's a philosophical debate afoot. The motivation of these organizations has a lot to do with ethical integrity, consistency, and commitment, and  it's all good. In all sectors, if you can play around large-scale social change, it's great and if companies don't want to, that's okay too. But a lot of the companies that play in the social enterprise space today were formed because of their desire to realize a specific social change or to realize social impact in a very specific way. Companies like Body Shop, Ben & Jerry's, Tom's Shoes, Stony Field Farms, Honest Tea -- all of these companies have very strong corporate social responsibility [CSR] principles baked into their DNA. There was no b.s. there [when these firms were created]. These principles were all very for-real; there was a tremendous amount of due diligence in the supply chain in terms of their environmental impact and so forth. Honest Tea, for example, did one of the most thorough and honest assessments of its carbon footprint, and they did that because of a genuine commitment to the environment and also a genuine concern for their bottom line. Coca-Cola just took a 40 percent stake in Honest Tea, and I think that within the next six months, Coke could buy a controlling stake in it. This has raised a lot of debate and speculation over whether these new developments will change Honest Tea. And it's not just Honest Tea. There is nothing in place -- no legal entities and no contract that insures that when a social enterprise changes hands that the corporate socially responsible behaviors that are associated with the brand -- the ones that made the company what it is -- are going to continue. There are, I think, some great efforts in play to encourage acquired companies to behave in more socially responsible ways but there is nothing that guarantees these behaviors will continue in the case of partnerships or takeovers by for-profit companies. Should public sentiment shift and suddenly [social enterprises] become less in vogue, what's to insure that these socially responsible behaviors continue beyond the initial relationships?<br />
<br />
<strong>Do you think it's possible to do well and do good?</strong><br />
<br />
Yes, but as far as Reynolds goes, what we're trying to do is to encourage young change-makers, up front, to choose. You cannot serve two masters equally. If you want to change the world, great. We're going to help students do that. But if you want to make money, that's okay too -- but know that the profit side of that equation might wind up suffering based on the other side. I definitely don't think it's about doing well by doing good. I think the desire and need to change the world has got to be paramount, and how well that happens will depend on how sustainable the core values of these enterprises are, either by contract or by law.<br />
<br />
<strong>So the ideal is to make profits but use much of those profits to sustain the social mission. Pocketing profits is less important.</strong><br />
<br />
<strong> </strong>Yes. Self-sustaining enterprises are the gold standard, of course. I think one of the challenges, though, is in the incorporation rules that exist in the United States. Right now, in many states, corporation bylaws say that the enterprise's primary responsibility is to the shareholders and related stakeholders. Having a primary responsbility to do social good? You can't do it. it's illegal. I mean, I think you can find situtions where a CEO can conceivably get sued for not acting unethically -- if the unethical behavior maximizes shareholder value. I think there also are great examples in the foundation world where you have such a strong firewall between the social mission and how the profits are generated,  that you can also run into problems. There was one foundation some years ago that gave millions to an environmental organization to shut down an environmentally egregious hog farm but it turned out that in the foundation's portfolio, the biggest holding was in that hog farm. There are conflicts like this that are not uncommon.<br />
<br />
<strong>You're saying that in these cases, you create a problem by your investments and then attempt to solve that problem by your philanthropy and the cycle continues.</strong><br />
<br />
Yes, and in the foundation community, the disconnect is that trying to align your fiduciary responsibilities with your social mission is not the order of the day for some foundations. To me, that's obscene. It's a huge impediment to doing social good that you set out to accomplish, chiefly for social enterprise organizations that exist in this no man's land between for-profit and nonprofit companies.<br />
<br />
<strong>What should be done?</strong><br />
<br />
I think the social entrepreneurial community needs to ensure that these organizations' missions persist even as these companies change hands over time. There are examples of social entrepreneurs who had to leave their companies once they were taken over and once the boards of directors opted to ignore social principles in the selling of these companies.  People like Seth Goldman [the founder of Honest Tea] feel the solution is still in the marketplace -- that if you create a product that people want, they will insist that those principles remain as part of the product. There are also a lot of exciting ideas floating around, like the Good Guide, where you can check the environmental impact of a design and there's a rating system involved so that consumers know which products remain true to their missions.<br />
<br />
<strong>So your view is that there needs to be more than intent and the power of the marketplace to insure the sustainability of a company's socially good values?</strong><br />
<br />
Yes. It definitely remains to be seen, the degree to which these new enterprises are still able to have the impact they were hoping to have when another company takes a controlling stake in what they do. Seth Goldman is very confident that he will have the opportunity to impact Coke but I haven't seen that happen before in a David and Goliath situation. Additionally, a legal entity means more than simply protecting the social principles upon which a company is founded. It's also about how companies are allowed to issue stock and hand out dividends and so forth. There is a movement to put legislation on the books in California and other states the will allow social enterprises to lock in their principles regardless of future ownership.<br />
<br />
<strong>And without such legislation or other legal way of protecting core social values, is this new field of social enterprise in danger of becoming obsolete down the road?</strong><br />
<br />
It would certainly put some of these enterprises' core values into jeopardy. The feeling is that this is one of the critical parts of a socially entrepreneurial structure that is needed.<br />
<br />
What do you think?<br />
<br />
<strong><br />
</strong>]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Growth of Social Enterprises in India</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Growth-of-Social-Enterprises-in-India/5024.html</link>
													<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:44:39 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Growth-of-Social-Enterprises-in-India/5024.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Change starts with ideas. And when ideas become reality, they transform life - this is the motto on which Rural Innovation Network, a social enterprise in India works. This enterprise has been dedicated towards improving the living standard of rural population in India.  Rural Innovation Network believes that environmental [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Change starts with ideas. And when ideas become reality, they transform life - this is the motto on which Rural Innovation Network, a social enterprise in India works. This enterprise has been dedicated towards improving the living standard of rural population in India.  Rural Innovation Network believes that environmental concerns are well understood by the rural people and several opportunities can be created out of it. The problem lies in the fact that these opportunities cannot be turned into a reality by the poor people as they don't have the access to infrastructure, skills and capital for reaching the market.<br />
<br />
Villgro by Rural Innovations Network is driven by the dreams of wealthy rural population in India. It includes a process that is imaginative, systematic as well as scientific. Villgro runs various core programs to fulfill its objective. The Lemelson Recognition and Mentoring Program is aimed at mentoring ideas and seed funding so that the rural people can also reach the markets with their business ideas. It is run in collaboration with Villgro and Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India and Lemelson Foundation funds this program. Samrudhhi is another program that works toward enhancing the last mile linkages to ensure prosperity at the village level. Through this program, accessible innovations will be made to rural farmers by Villgro in few cities of Tamil Nadu, India. In an attempt to increase reach in remote rural areas; this enterprise has also collaborated with institutions that have a rural presence across India. It believes that there are several rural innovations that can be commercialized as successful micro enterprises. These enterprises will not only be beneficial for the rural consumers but it will also help in the creation of sustainable wealth. Villgro has been striving to establish this model in an attempt to transform ideas into reality and encourage rural population with skills and infrastructure to help them make a living.<br />
<br />
Villgro has been striving hard to use innovations in order to transform rural lives. Since it started in 2001, approximately 1500 innovations have been activated and more than 13 lac rural lives have been transformed.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>10 Rules for Sustaining Your Social Enterprise</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/10-Rules-for-Sustaining-Your-Social-Enterprise/4890.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:30:32 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/10-Rules-for-Sustaining-Your-Social-Enterprise/4890.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[The climate for investor funding is still a stormy one; it's always tough to hear about the social ventures that don't make it past the early stages. It's no wonder, then, that a recent post by Peter Haas on the TED Fellows 2009 blog caught my eye. It's all about how to avoid getting blown out of the water before you can sc [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[The climate for investor funding is still a stormy one; it's always tough to hear about the social ventures that don't make it past the early stages. It's no wonder, then, that a recent post by Peter Haas on the TED Fellows 2009 blog caught my eye. It's all about how to avoid getting blown out of the water before you can scale.<br />
<br />
Herewith, with thanks to Peter [and apologies to him for some paraphrasing] are some suggestions about how to sustain you and your social venture -- from the start:<br />
<br />
1. <strong>Don't start a new organization.</strong> Better to ask what you can do to help something that already exists to become more effective. Think twice about starting something from scratch when you might achieve your goals faster by working first in a management position somewhere else.<br />
<br />
2. <strong>Clearly define what you do and stick with it.</strong> In other words, take baby steps. Don't try to save the whole world in one fell swoop. "In the massive unmet need, there is always the temptation to run the feeding-housing-water-sanitation-ecotourism-renewable energy-child education-dolphin-saving program," Haas says. But being too diverse in your goals can be a turn-off to potential investors. Better to propose doing one or two things well and being selective about program expansion, he says.<br />
<br />
3.<strong> Clearly state your budgets and cash flow</strong>. Track where you are regularly. Haas suggests pulling out an excel sheet, and recommends this template from the for-profit world: http://caribbean.smetoolkit.org/caribbean/en/file/195?1194044785. You will end up doing more harm in the world than good if you have to close your program down because you were caught by surprise on your finances.<br />
<br />
4. <strong>Ask for more than you think you need</strong>. "If you have a well-communicated business plan, have made the right connections, have the right board and advisors, you have a better chance of making your impact by starting with enough resources to atually enact your mission at some scale instead of constantly being stuck dealing in trials," Haas says.<br />
<br />
5. <strong>Get a lawyer and get legal.</strong> Get everything in writingfrom your contracts and grants to your partnerships and lease records. Keep those records in a safe place. Great documentation attracts capital down the road.<br />
<br />
6. <strong>Pay yourself and your staff from the start.</strong> Sure, everybody wants to volunteer in the beginning but many early stage social enterprises end up fizzling because they and their staffs are too broke to get by while creating their new venture. Again, it's like the airplane rule: give  yourself oxygen first so you can save the baby.<br />
<br />
7. <strong>Transparency is key</strong>. Communication openly with your staff and board and spell our roles and responsibilities from the start. Assign authority and make it clear who has the final say in decisions. Many new enterprises fail to get off the ground because they try to run themselves by committee. Appoint a benevolent dictator to get you movingbut somebody who will listen and is great about building consensus.<br />
<br />
8. <strong>Treat your donors and the people you serve as your customers. </strong>You're a middleman, beholden to the funds you get in the door and the people you're trying to serve. It's not about you.<br />
<br />
9. <strong>Play nice with others.</strong> Think partnerships. Figure out early how to leverage the strengths and experiences of other more established groups instead of trying to do everything yourself.<br />
<br />
10. <strong>Don't be a nonprofit. </strong>Haas cites  Tom's Shoes, SKS Microfinance and others as being able to scale quickly because they were for-profit entities. Investment can be easier to find than donation, and there are plenty of social ills that can be solved in a for-profit model, he says. "See if your cause fits."<br />
<br />
What do you think?]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>PopTech Recap: Mobile Enterprise</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/PopTech-Recap-Mobile-Enterprise/4920.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:15:56 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/PopTech-Recap-Mobile-Enterprise/4920.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[I'm back in New York from Maine, where I was attending PopTech's 2009 conference: America Reimagined. In going through my notes of last week's presentations by the more than 50 speakers -- entrepreneurs, academicians, inventors, artists and advocates -- four people [mostly PopTech fellows] were especially focused on finding [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm back in New York from Maine, where I was attending <a href="http://poptech.org/2009schedule">PopTech's 2009 conference: America Reimagined.</a> In going through my notes of last week's presentations by the more than 50 speakers -- entrepreneurs, academicians, inventors, artists and advocates -- four people [mostly PopTech fellows] were especially focused on finding ways to use cellphones to help those living at the Bottom of the Pyramid.<br />
<br />
[PopTech organizers also tipped their hats to BoP projects; this year's attendee bags given to each conferee were BoP-friendly, developed by MIT architect Sheila Kennedy, who has helped spearhead PopTech's portable lighting project. The FLAP bag [for Flexible Light & Power] is a Timbuk2 messenger bag outfitted with small solar array, battery and LED. A removable panel lined with reflective material amplifies the light from a tiny bulb tucked into a strap. PopTech organizers said AfriGadget's Erik Hersman recently took some prototypes to Africa for field testing. The upshot? "Solar isn't just for rooftops and calculators anymore," says PopTech. Now you can literally wear power on your shoulder.]<br />
<br />
Here's a brief summary of some of the BoP projects and their founders:<br />
<br />
* <strong>FrontlineSMS:Medic</strong>: When founder and PopTech fellow Josh Nesbit traveled to Malawi in the summer of 2007 to intern at a hospital there, he was struck by the inadequacy of medical services in the region. "That hospital had two doctors attending to a quarter of a million people," recalls Nesbit, a Stanford pre-med student at the time. Further, healthcare workers had to travel dozens of miles to isolated African villages just to see patients, often having to lug boxes of medical records with them. Nesbit says he was at the hospital for six weeks before he met a single health care worker from the community, a man whose name was Dixon. "He opened his notebooks and there were beautifully handwritten drug adherence charts, but Dixon was walking 35 miles every day to the central clinic, just so the nurse could check his work," Nesbit said. So Nesbit bought 100 cell phones at $100 each and trained community health workers how to text-message each other and the clinic, instead -- transforming all of those paper records into texts that can quickly be sent from one cellphone to another. "All of a sudden, these remote community health workers were connected." Out of this effort came a change of career focus for Nesbit and the for-profit FrontlineSMS, a free, open-source software platform that enables large-scale, two-way text messaging using only a laptop, a GSM modem and inexpensive cell phones. At PopTech last week, Nesbit launched Phone Hope, a new drive to collect old and used cellphones from people in the States, recycle them, and use those credits buy new, more appropriate phones for health workers in Malawi, Bangladesh and distressed communities in the United States. "If we are able to recycle just one percent of discarded phones for one year, we could help clinics provide better health care to 50 million people," Nesbit says. Recycle your old phone and help health workers save lives.<br />
<br />
* <strong>Hayat Sindi</strong> is a Saudi medical researcher, advocate for women and girls in science education, and founder of Diagnostics For All, a nonprofit that is creating point-of-care diagnostic devices micro-fabricated in paper. According to PopTech curator Andrew Zolli, these paper devices represent a "game-changing" technology for delivering low-cost medical care in the developing world. Sindi, born in Mecca into a family of 8 siblings, left home in her teens and -- not speaking a word of English -- eventually found her way into Kings College in Britain and received a scholarship to get a PhD in biotechnology from Cambridge. Three years ago, she moved to Harvard to work in a special scientific lab geared to social innovation. Out of that lab, Diagnostics for All was born. "Paper is very low-cost," Sindi says, "and it can be carried, folded and put in a pocket. It is safely disposable and requires only a minimum amount of tears, saliva, or urine to give results in seconds." The device works this way: A drop of bodily fluid is dropped onto the paper, and it reacts with chemicals built into wells embedded in the paper. The paper changes colors, depending on the presence or absence of, say, glucose or protein. Sindi says the first application of the technology will be used to spot liver damage, which she says is not being treated in the developing world. In the U.S., Sindi says, 5 percent of patients medicated for HIV develop liver failure; in the developing world, that figure jumps to 15 percent. "If we add TB [the number goes up to] 2.3 million patients who will die, not because of the disease but because of the side effects from the drugs meant to save them." Sindi also is known for being a powerful advocate for science education and careers for women in the Middle East: A few years ago, she was part of a group of Arab women who peddled for peace -- participating in a bicycle ride from Beirut to Ramallah intended "to send a message to world leaders to get on with it," Sindi said, "and stop the suffering that continuous conflict brings."<br />
<br />
* <strong>Nigel Waller</strong> launched <a href="http://www.movirtu.com/index-1a.html">Movirtu</a> in 2008 -- mortgaging his home to do it -- so as to build a company that will provide access to basic mobile phone services for people earning less than $2 a day. Under Nigel's leadership, Movirtu has designed a virtual mobile phone system which enables anyone to make and receive phone calls, text messages and mobile payments utilizing other people's phones. It's all about granting access to mobile communications even to those without their own phone, Waller says. How do they do it? Morvirtu uses so-called cloud computing -- which essentially, in this context, would offer portable mobile services to people much like electricity is provided from a grid. Given quick and simple access to "the cloud," Movirtu enables BoP populations to find work, build micro-enterprises, access health care and better support themselves and their families by having access to others and resources online via mobile phones. Prior to Morvirtu, Waller worked with a variety of blue-chip for-profit companies including Sema Group, Glenayre and Schlumberger, gaining extensive international experience in Sub-Sahara Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America.<br />
<br />
* <strong>Aydogan Ozcan</strong>, the chief of the Bio- and Nano-Photonics Laboratory at UCLA, is developing a way for health workers to detect infectious diseases using a cell phone, mostly by turning their phones into a kind of microscope that can be used to analyze blood samples from anywhere, any time. "This lets us do some extraordinary things," Ozcan says. "We can diagnose sickle-cell anemia, count cell signatures based on their texture, get complete blood counts and detect bacteria like E. coli  in water, potentially avoiding contamination." The product is in early stages, he says. It works in the lab and a small number of prototypes are being field tested.  "This technology has the potential to transform the delivery of medical services to the world's poorest populations," says Ozcan.<br />
<br />
Watch this space for more highlights.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Entrepreneur: A Definition</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Entrepreneur-A-Definition/4705.html</link>
													<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:31:06 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Entrepreneur-A-Definition/4705.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Urban Dictionary defines "social enterprise" as "groups or people who help the poor to make a living while teaching them how to make a business out of it, as well." Not bad. But just try finding a decent explanation of the phrase "social entrepreneur." Give up yet? Even Urban Dictionary, the Web-based dictionary of the newe [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Urban Dictionary defines "social enterprise" as "groups or people who help the poor to make a living while teaching them how to make a business out of it, as well." Not bad. But just try finding a decent explanation of the phrase "social entrepreneur." Give up yet? Even Urban Dictionary, the Web-based dictionary of the newest words and phrases, doesn't yet offer a definition.<br />
<br />
And that's a problem, says New York University professor <a href="http://wagner.nyu.edu/light">Paul Light</a>, who has been studying the new field of social enterprise since the beginning. He says that persistent confusion over what -- or who -- is a social entrepreneur can often trigger disputes between people and groups who feel that everyone working for social change should qualify as one. But that wouldn't be fair, says Light. His definition of social entrepreneurship?  "An effort to solve a tough social problem through innovative or pattern-breaking ideas." [The word "innovative" is key, he says, as is the notion of problem-solving versus problem-treating.]<br />
<br />
I caught up with Light recently to discuss his three-year quest for a definition and his 2009 book, <em>The Search for Social Entrepreneurship</em>. Light says social entrepreneurs tend to be more tech-savvy and optimistic than others but urges leaders in this new field to start focusing less on its charismatic personalities and more on which ideas work -- and which don't. "You don't find -- and there hasn't been -- a good investigation of failure," he says.<br />
<br />
<strong>Why did you embark on this quest for clarity?</strong><br />
I've been monitoring management reform in nonprofits and government for some years now and the concept of social entrepreneurship is pretty visible through organizations such as Ashoka and Echoing Green; more and more of our students at the Wagner School are interested in starting their own nonprofits and solving big problems rather than ameliorating them. I wrote an article for the <em>Stanford Social Innovation Review</em> in 2006 that said there appeared to be a cult of personality surrounding the concept of social entrepreneurship; we have become fascinated with these individual heroes and we have been putting the focus on finding these sparkly charismatic leaders and funding them to pursue pattern-breaking change. I wrote that it's not the hero we should be focused on. I said that social entrepreneurship can come from existing organizations and big old organizations as well as fresh start-ups. It provoked a pretty instant response from the field. I then continued to do research and then wrote this book to summarize what I was seeing.<br />
<br />
<strong>What did you find?</strong><br />
The more I read, the more was I able to unpack the underlying broad assumptions that define social entrepreneurship as an effort to solve a tough social problem through innovative or pattern-breaking ideas. I have come to agree that there is something different about the social entrepreneur. But I also found plenty of examples suggesting that social entrepreneurship is not a singular -- but a plural. By that I mean that many organizations pursue social entrepreneurship through partnerships and teams and through networks, and our tendency in conferences and fellowship programs is to reward the individual when, in fact, we might be better off rewarding the idea or the organization along with the individual. In fact, the lone wolf entrepreneur is fairly rare and they're often less successful in bringing their ideas to fruition than groups and networks and even communities of individuals. At the same time, I no longer feel there's this cult of personality. There really are individuals out there who pursue pattern-breaking change against the odds and we should look for both types of entrepreneurs.<br />
<br />
<strong>Social entrepreneurs behave differently than others?</strong><br />
There's this prevailing notion that they're more risk-tolerant, which does not appear to be true. What they are is extremely optimistic about their chances of success. And that goes for the lone wolves as well as for the socially entrepreneurial teams and networks. They all have very high confidence that they will succeed and they often ignore evidence to the contrary because they believe so strongly that they'll succeed. We don't have many stories about failed social entrepreneurs. The field as a whole has focused almost exclusively on success stories and perhaps that's the way it is at the beginning of an expansion of any field. The focus on the entrepreneurial individual dates back to the early 1980s with Bill Drayton and Ashoka but it turns out that optimism and confidence are what drive the perseverance that produces this kind of constant focus on driving forward with change. It's not that these people have a gene that can be identified as social entrepreneurship. It's that they really see the world in very optimistic terms. Additionally, they're not more likely to take risks than others but they do tend through their optimism to stick with it, and when they are told they are going to fail, they actually invest even more energy; they rebel against messages that suggest they're somehow on the wrong track. This optimism can shift into overconfidence and entrepreneurs of all types need to be careful about that. They need to fine-tune and listen to what the "market" is saying to them about their idea. They also need to be aware that they do see the world in very optimistic terms and therefore need to check themselves from time to time and challenge their own assumptions about their ideas.<br />
<br />
<strong>What have been some of the key failures?</strong><br />
There's so much enthusiasm for the idea of social entrepreneurship that we are not taking careful inventories of where success occurs and where failure might reside. We're lacking an entire branch of research that would be very useful for instructing nascent social entrepreneurs on what they can do to avoid failure. That's a problem in the field right now and one of the threats to developing the field so it's useful to people who want to launch a change effort.<br />
<br />
<strong>What kinds of research would be most useful in your view?</strong><br />
There are sweeping studies about success and failure in the field of business entrepreneurship. Is the organization still alive? Is its market share increasing? Is it profitable? Yet when we go to blended organizations or nonprofits, we just don't have those indicators. Ashoka uses some reasonable indicators to get the dialogue started, like; to what extent do their fellows affect policy change? To what extent are their ideas still alive? But we need better measures of outcomes if we're going to start separating the wheat from the chaff in social entrepreneurship, and we just don't have those yet.<br />
<br />
There's also a lot of argument over what constitutes success. Do you have to change the world or can you change a piece of the world? Does it have to be changing an entire policy regime within a country or within a region or even a continent, or can it be changing a city block and diffusing the idea so that others can pick up the change effort for their city blocks and eventually you have a cascading affect? There's a lot of confusion in the field right now. There's great promise in social entrepreneurship but we need to help social entrepreneurs know where to best invest in their own ideas to get them up and running.<br />
<br />
<strong>To what extent do social media play a role in social entrepreneurship?</strong><br />
The most effective ideas out there harness new technologies towards large-scale change; in the Obama campaign and in the organizations I've come to really admire, Internet technologies are used very effectively. How well an organization uses technology may be a key marker of a potentially successful idea. I like Accion, which is microfinance; I like idealist.org, which uses technology to empower change agents and help build the community; I like Environmental Defense, which has a model of environmental change that involves partnerships with business. Some of these organizations don't apply for the awards, they don't show up at the big conferences, they're not involved in the dialogue about the social entrepreneurship agenda. Yet they're doing extremely important work and often reject the use of the term social entrepreneurship to describe what they do. But maybe some of those organizations are the ones we ought to be looking for, the ones that fly beneath the radar. Perhaps it's our job to find them rather than rely on them to find us. Perhaps the field overemphasizes self-selected entrepreneurs and misses a lot of organizations reluctant to self-identify as socially entrepreneurial organizations but which could use more help scaling up and moving ahead. The venture capital model says you present to us and we decide if you get money. The social entrepreneurial model may require us to be more proactive in finding social change efforts and promoting the ones that could take off. That would, however, require the social entrepreneurial community to be more proactive and aggressive in identifying the work being done in the field.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Does Your Social Venture Have Founder's Syndrome?</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Does-Your-Social-Venture-Have-Founder-s-Syndrome/4651.html</link>
													<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:36:23 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Does-Your-Social-Venture-Have-Founder-s-Syndrome/4651.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[At the start of any social enterprise, the drive and vision of the founder is key: when it comes to social problem-solving, the founder is often on a crusade that has become personal and passionate.

But what happens when the founder won't step out of the way of his own staff to help the organization scale?

Once more today [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[At the start of any social enterprise, the drive and vision of the founder is key: when it comes to social problem-solving, the founder is often on a crusade that has become personal and passionate.<br />
<br />
But what happens when the founder won't step out of the way of his own staff to help the organization scale?<br />
<br />
Once more today, I heard about a social enterprise CEO who was able to score some promising buy-in from potential marketers and foundationsonly to end up dooming the organization after several months because he wouldn't let his newly hired staff execute on strategy. He ended up stifling innovation, staff development, and brand awareness with his inability to yield control. His lack of focus and unwillingness to abide by his staff's efforts to work with him (or around him) ended up threatening the venture's access to capital and the venture failed to make the transition from pet project to sustainable enterprise.<br />
<br />
Do you have a similar story to share?<br />
<br />
How can social ventures benefit from the vision and energy of their founders without sacrificing their ability to scale and attract/retain top talent and capital?<br />
<br />
How might recruiting a board help reign in a CEO unwilling to be challenged?<br />
<br />
What role can marketing play in resolving the problem?<br />
<br />
How can outside pressure be brought to bear on helping social enterprises with Founder's Syndrome to address the problem?<br />
<br />
What other methods can be used to help the founder help himself/herselfand his/her organization?<br />
<br />
Please join us today in a conversation about how best to resolve some of these issues. What have you experienced in your social enterprises or nonprofit ventures? And, how were you able to resolve these issues?<br />
<br />
Let us hear from you.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Enterpreneurs: Who's Left Out?</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterpreneurs-Who-s-Left-Out/4637.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:44:28 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterpreneurs-Who-s-Left-Out/4637.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[There's a growing debate in the social enterprise world, not only about who's a social entrepreneur but about who's being left out of the club.

True, the exceptions and misconceptions abound, but the debate settles around two main points -- that unless you're a Caucasian and unless you're an MBA, it's tougher to get suppor [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a growing debate in the social enterprise world, not only about who's a social entrepreneur but about who's being left out of the club.<br />
<br />
True, the exceptions and misconceptions abound, but the debate settles around two main points -- that unless you're a Caucasian and unless you're an MBA, it's tougher to get support for your good work trying to start a social enterprise.<br />
<br />
Is that fair? Consider the arguments. The first point being raised by some across the sector is that MBAs seem to be preferred by social ventures and the foundations willing to fund aspiring social entrepreneurs. Employers, the argument goes, also seem to prefer MBAs, but the truth is that not everyone who can make a difference or start a social enterprise can afford business school -- nor think they should have to get an MBA in order to get funding to develop their ideas.  "I have no MBA nor do I want one," says Martin Montero, the founder of Austin Social Innovation Fund. Montero tweeted me the other day in response to one of my queries about an October 15 <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574469602649140462.html?mod=rss_management">story </a>in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> that cites the surge of interest by business school students in "socially-responsible money-making." The article also notes how business schools are being pushed to create a whole host of courses and study tracks to help MBA students sort out the best way to build companies that both make money and help to solve social problems.  Montero and others, including a number of Justmeans community members who messaged me earlier this week, said the fuss over socially-minded MBAs tends to leave out a great deal of people who are not in business school but who already have been making a big difference in the sector. " We most definitely need more non-MBA social entrepreneurs," Montero wrote.<br />
<br />
A second point I keep hearing is that the developing world is, more or less, being left out of the conversation. Justmeans community member Gerard Ww, in a comment responding to my introductory column as social enterprise editor of Justmeans, said that "no company, organization, or individuals (seems) willing to really get their hands truly dirty side-by-side with us (those people at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_of_the_pyramid">bottom of the pyramid</a>) while trying to help the BoP!" Describing himself as one of the billions at the bottom of the pyramid, he said that "we are never included in the [potential] interventions; it's always the so-called academics and 'successful' business persons who dictate terms and conditions. Too few of us will ever be helped by the continued exclusion, but who else knows the conditions [at the bottom of the pyramid] better" than the people who live there?<br />
<br />
Gerard isn't the only person posing the question.  Rod Schwartz, CEO of <a href="http://www.clearlyso.com/">ClearlySo</a>, an online marketplace that aims to raise the visibility of social businesses, sparked a lively debate earlier this year when he posed on the SocialEdge blog the following question: "Are the only innovations in social entrepreneurship Anglo-Saxon?" Schwartz had asked the same question at the <a href="http://www.skollworldforum.com/">2009 Skoll World Forum</a>, which I also attended, asking fellow conferees what they thought of the fact that a majority of the speakers and panelists were Caucasian. Ashni Mohnot, who joins me as a contributing blogger at <a href="http://www.poptech.org/">PopTech</a>, wrote on that site this past summer that "many of the top socially entrepreneurial organizations work in international development, building products, services and social capital to improve lives at the base of the pyramid, yet they are often based in the UK or the US with founders and CEOs hailing from the Western world." She cited D.light Design, FORGE, FaceAids, and Kiva as some examples of social ventures that develop their products by native Westerners or those educated in the West. Mohnot wrote that while these social ventures "subsequently engage locals in pilots, distribution or marketing, the initial product design is often the sole realm of the US arm."<br />
<br />
To be sure, it's not true that all social innovators have MBAs and that they're all "Anglo-Saxon" as Schwartz put it. But the debate continues over what some see as troubling trends in this new field of social enterprise.<br />
<br />
What do you think? Do you perceive yourself to be in what Mohnot called an elite "social entrepreneur's club?" Or is the debate unfair or misinformed? Does it raise some important or long-ignored issues that should continue to be discussed on these pages and across the sector? Let us hear from you.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>How Are Social Enterprises Changing the World?</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/How-Are-Social-Enterprises-Changing-World/4616.html</link>
													<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:49:03 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/How-Are-Social-Enterprises-Changing-World/4616.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[The prospect of making money yet making a difference can be very appealing. The failure of private sector in addressing serious social and environmental issues has led to the emergence of non-profit organizations, commonly referred to as social enterprises. Money can't be considered the sole requirement to combat such issue [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[The prospect of making money yet making a difference can be very appealing. The failure of private sector in addressing serious social and environmental issues has led to the emergence of non-profit organizations, commonly referred to as social enterprises. Money can't be considered the sole requirement to combat such issues; however, it certainly plays an important role in the implementation of solutions. Social enterprises also make profit but unlike the private sector, the profit is reinvested for the upliftment of communities.<br />
<br />
Social enterprises all across the globe have been involved in changing the world. From creating employment opportunities to reduce poverty to providing affordable education to children from all walks of life, one can't deny the importance of social enterprises in an economy. When it comes to the access of affordable education, Aspire Public Schools has been playing an important role in the US. This non-profit organization is involved in the establishment and operation of quality charter schools all over California. Charter schools are free from any education bureaucracy and regulations applied by the state. In turn, the school is responsible for fiscal solvency and student achievements. This organization has been working hard towards the reinforcement of the possibility that every child can go to college.<br />
<br />
The main aim of Aspire Public Schools is to provide college going opportunity to kids who might never have the chance to study further. Efforts are being made to transform the public school system of America so that more kids can complete their college education. This non-profit organization is working on a district, state as well as national level to seek a broader impact. It is trying to bring change in selected areas by influencing schools at the district level. Effective collaboration with charter organizations is being established so that more high performing public schools can be created at the state level.<br />
<br />
Organizations like these are bringing positive changes within the society; however, it will be interesting to see whether or not the objective of Aspire Public Schools to produce more than 1200 graduates per year is fulfilled.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Enterprises Delivering Health Services to Get Extended Support</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterprises-Delivering-Health-Services-Get-Extended-Support/4544.html</link>
													<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:19:15 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterprises-Delivering-Health-Services-Get-Extended-Support/4544.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[New as well as existing social enterprises delivering health care services are provided investment by the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF). In 2007, this fund was set up in order to stimulate the expansion of social enterprises providing health care facilities in the UK. The main aim of Social Enterprise Investment  [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[New as well as existing social enterprises delivering health care services are provided investment by the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF). In 2007, this fund was set up in order to stimulate the expansion of social enterprises providing health care facilities in the UK. The main aim of Social Enterprise Investment Fund is to enhance the quality of services being offered to patients across the country. This objective is being met by enabling social firms to provide quality social and health care services to the patients.<br />
<br />
Futurebuilders England manages this fund on behalf of the Department for Health. In association with Partnerships UK, it provides extended services to this department in order to extend support to organizations that aim to become a social enterprise delivering health as well as social care services. Futurebuilders England and Partnerships UK will also be working in co-ordination with an independent investment panel to support and manage investments made by the Social Enterprise Investment Fund.<br />
<br />
Social enterprises that are looking for ways to expand their services in the health sector can apply to this investment fund. The fund also receives applications from group of professionals such as nurse and doctors who want to form a social enterprise and offer quality health care services. Enterprises that apply to this investment fund are required to be working as a non-profit organization.<br />
<br />
In an attempt to encourage more applications, Futurebuilders England will be coming up with new financial solutions such as grants, equity investment products and loans. The fund will also offer business support services for the development of social enterprises. In order to bring new as well as existing social firms together, SEIF conducts workshops where the firm owners can get a clear idea of the potential challenges companies might face in this sector. With the help of these workshops SEIF plans to develop understanding of the present and future contribution of social firms in community and primary care. These are also effective in making the benefits and opportunities of a good relation between public sector and service providers prominent.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Three Social Revolutionaries</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Three-Social-Revolutionaries/4493.html</link>
													<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:27:20 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Three-Social-Revolutionaries/4493.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof once called social entrepreneurs "the 21st century answer to the student protesters of the 1960s" -- and yet what strikes me about many of these new innovators is that they don't often think of themselves, at least at first, as doing anything extraordinary.

Kristof said that in the [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>New York Times</em> columnist Nicholas Kristof once called social entrepreneurs "the 21st century answer to the student protesters of the 1960s" -- and yet what strikes me about many of these new innovators is that they don't often think of themselves, at least at first, as doing anything extraordinary.<br />
<br />
Kristof said that in the '60s, the most remarkable people in the States (and, I might add, in Tokyo, India, Europe and elsewhere) were the civil rights workers and antiwar protesters who started movements that transformed their countries. In the 1980s, rock star rabble-rousers included people like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who started companies that ended up revolutionizing the way we use technology. Today, the most fascinating people, to my mind, are the multitude of young, grassroots social entrepreneurs from around the world -- those who see a problem in society and use a combination of new ideas, social organizing skills and technology to turn entire industries on their ears.<br />
<br />
Here are just a few such people I've met at various conferences over the last month. I'm noting them here as much for their unconventional approaches to world problem-solving as their rapid ability so far to have an impact (never mind that they're half the age of everyone else at these events).<br />
<br />
Ariel Zylbersztejn, who attended last Friday's Social Enterprise Conference at Columbia University, is a 28-year-old Mexican film school graduate who founded and runs <a href="http://www.cinepop.com.mx/el_cine_a_tu_alcance/quees_i.html">Cinepop</a>, a company that projects movies onto inflatable screens and shows them free in poor rural communities. Zylbersztejn said he started Cinepop four years ago because some 90 percent of the people in Mexico can't afford to buy movie tickets. His first corporate sponsor was Act II, the microwaveable popcorn company; he has since linked up with micro-credit agencies and social welfare groups, as well as dozens of small and medium-sized businesses across Mexico which will pay him to score a table in an "opportunity tent" that Cinepop sets up in rural neighborhoods for a week before each screening. "Each showing is a way to promote social programs, like free medical consultation or employment training," Zylbersztejn says.<br />
<br />
So far so good: Some 350,000 people have watched movies on his screens so far this year. His goal is to reach 1 million people by the end of 2010 and 5 million people by 2015 -- as well as take the Cinepop model to Brazil, India, China and other countries. And down the road? Zylbersztejn wants to make movies of his own, to raise awareness of "real people with real problems," he says. "Am I a social entrepreneur?" he shakes his head and smiles. "In Mexico, nobody knows what that is." If Zylbersztejn gets his way, it won't be long now.<br />
<br />
Another young social innovator to watch is Emily Pilloton, 27, founder and executive director of <a href="http://projecthdesign.org/contact.htmlhttp://">Project H Design</a>, a social nonprofit that creates  problem-solving designs to empower individuals, communities and local economies in need. Pilloton said at last month's <a href="http://https://www.cuspconference.com/2009/">CUSP conference</a> in Chicago that she came up with the idea for Project H while she was living with her parents and had only about $1,000 to her name, as well as "a laundry list of people I was going to prove wrong about consumption-driven design."  Today, less than two years later, Project H  has collected $46,000 in donations averaging $43 each, which are being used to support nine chapters, six in the United States and 3 internationally, and engage 300 designers working on 22 projects. One, called Learning Landscape, helps students and teachers in Uganda, North Carolina and the Dominican Republic to "play" their way to better math scores.  The simple, $500 playground installations are comprised of 25 reclaimed tires "that you bury halfway in the ground in a grid and base learning games on," Pilloton says. A student favorite? "Match Me" -- a game in which students line up in 2 teams, one on each side of the playground; teachers call out math questions and the first student to sit on a tire numbered with the correct answer wins. Pilloton is working with the Palo-Alto-based design firm, nonobject, to develop an off-the-shelf retail and tabletop version that would be available to teachers anywhere. Chapters of Project H Design also have collaborated with LA's homeless and delivered <a href="http://www.hipporoller.org/">Hippo Rollers</a> to Africa (cutting production costs of  the water-transport devices in half). "We devise systems, not stuff; we work with, not for," she says. "I started this with no particular business plan in mind but I believe that design can change the world," she says. "The need will shape the business." Indeed, Pilloton, author of the just-released book, <em>Design Revolution: 100 Products that Empower People</em>, said she hopes to launch Studio H next fall, a design/build program to teach creative problem-solving and building skills through community engagement projects.<br />
<br />
A third young social innovator to watch is Sarah Evans. What I like most about her social venture is that it involves her use of social capital -- the 30,000 people who follow her on Twitter -- to create a new type of  company. Her firm, <a href="http://prsarahevans.com/sevans-strategy/">Sevans Strategy</a>, helps causes in need of rapid action. Last summer, when a financially beleaguered Elgin, Ill. crisis hotline came to her for help, Evans mobilized her network to raise $30,000 in 12 hours -- and $164,000 in two weeks -- to save the center. "I donated my network, but I am also creating a new model for business," she told me at CUSP. "Social media isn't about having a Facebook page. That's just noise. The real promise of social media is being able to mobilize networks to execute. Social capital for good -- and for hire -- represents the next wave of new businesses."<br />
<br />
As we all follow (or tune out) the recent petty bickering over whether or not President Obama should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, let's not forget there's no limit to the number of young social entrepreneurs who are in the trenches working to make the world a better place -- regardless of what happens in Washington.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>A New Voice for Social Enterprise</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/A-New-Voice-for-Social-Enterprise/4457.html</link>
													<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:56:52 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Marcia Stepanek</author>													
													<dc:creator>Marcia Stepanek</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/A-New-Voice-for-Social-Enterprise/4457.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Welcome to my first post as Editor of the Social Enterprise section. I hope you will enjoy the content and join me in tracking new trends.

I've been a fan of Justmeans and its Founder/CEO Martin Smith and I'm delighted by the conversations that you, he and others in the Justmeans community have seeded around the unique opp [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Welcome to my first post as Editor of the Social Enterprise section. I hope you will enjoy the content and join me in tracking new trends.<br />
<br />
I've been a fan of Justmeans and its Founder/CEO Martin Smith and I'm delighted by the conversations that you, he and others in the Justmeans community have seeded around the unique opportunity that exists at this moment of time to make market-based change in the world. As a journalist and author whose career has included stints as an investigative reporter, writer and editor in the United States and abroad for such news companies as NPR, Hearst, BusinessWeek, MSNBC, and Knight-Ridder, I've been fortunate to have had a front-row seat at some of the biggest stories of our times -- the rise of the global economy, the proliferation of the Internet, and the emergence of today's newly self-organized, cause-wired groups that are just starting to take on traditional businesses and challenge them to do better.<br />
<br />
Thanks to mass globalization and social media -- now evolving from social networking to mobilization --the world has never seemed smaller, nor more aware of itself. We can see the same brands being advertised in central Dubai as in Manhattan; our closest neighbors are more likely now to be found online; everything can be googled, and we have never been so mobile: there is more computing power in our Blackberries than there was in the control room in Houston that put a man on the moon.<br />
<br />
All of this, of course, presents both an opportunity and a burden for today's social enterprise movement. In a networked world where everyone is adjacent and everything can be known, we are seeing increasing evidence of the inequities around us. "When you are actually adjacent to these people -- the have-nots  [and when the have-nots know what we have]," All for Good cofounder Jonathan Greenblatt said last month at Mashable's social enterprise conference in Manhattan, "it puts a burden on the 'haves' [in society]." Indeed, he and others say, we are compelled to invent new alternatives.<br />
<br />
What's encouraging is that this new "economy of integrity" is already in the making, giving us different answers than the ones we've heard before to the questions we are facing as a society. Think Zipcar, the Netflix for cars. Or Living Homes, a Los Angeles-based construction business that is building homes that generate more power than they consume. Or Tom's Shoes, which donates a pair of shoes to someone in need for every pair purchased. Or Revolution Foods, which is offering healthier meals to kids around the U.S. as an alternative to junk food in public schools.<br />
<br />
And that's just for starters. The lion's share of new business growth in the next 10-15 years will be at the "bottom of the pyramid" where the poorest billions live. Social enterprise and social media will both cohere this moment of opportunity and catalyze it, for better or worse. We have opportunities before us that were never before possible.<br />
<br />
My request to you? Help me analyze and explore this perfect storm of adjacency, new media and social innovation that animates today's social enterprise movement. Share what keeps you up at night and the new ideas for more socially responsible businesses that are gaining traction in your networks. I agree with Ashoka founder Bill Drayton, who said at last month's Clinton Global Initiative that the global economic crisis has finally given legitimacy to social enterprise as the best hope for innovation in the 21st century. While most social enterprises still struggle to scale impact and measure it, he said, these new "triple-bottom-line" businesses are "potent with possibilities for fueling the revolutions we've all been waiting for."<br />
<br />
I look forward to exploring them with you, together.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Emergence of Social Enterprises in India</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Emergence-of-Social-Enterprises-in-India/4449.html</link>
													<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:45:21 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Emergence-of-Social-Enterprises-in-India/4449.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[Like rest of the world, Indian economy has also suffered major setbacks during the global financial crisis. Employees have either faced salary cuts or they have lost their job. The present financial meltdown has also resulted in sudden cutback in expenditure by companies. If experts are to be believed, financial crisis is t [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[Like rest of the world, Indian economy has also suffered major setbacks during the global financial crisis. Employees have either faced salary cuts or they have lost their job. The present financial meltdown has also resulted in sudden cutback in expenditure by companies. If experts are to be believed, financial crisis is the end result of the irresponsible activities carried out by the corporate sector, even though not all are to be blamed.<br />
<br />
The present need is to encourage medium and small sized social enterprises that will help the country come out of this situation. Since these enterprises work for social and environmental causes and re-invest their profits for community welfare, their vision can help any economy sail through financial crisis. The existing sector of growing social enterprises in India can prove extremely beneficial in delivering required services on the community level. Even though India is a developing nation, social enterprises have been very active in fulfilling social and environmental causes. Whether it is the Barefoot College,Nidan or SELCO, social enterprises in India have managed to make a significant difference to the lives of urban and rural population.<br />
<br />
Sadly, many such enterprises have been hard hit by the current economic downturn. Regular funding and support from government and businesses is required for the smooth functioning of these enterprises. The private sector plays an important role in the creation as well as promotion of social enterprises. Experts believe that even though the downturn has caused many such enterprises to close down, social enterprises will continue to generate more business value and help the economy get back on track. With government's support, such enterprises are striving to deliver new products and services. Along with the generation of business value, entrepreneurs are also addressing pressing issues of the society. Due to the success of social enterprises during recession, many private firms have also realized the benefits of adopting socially responsible initiatives. They have been compelled to think beyond profit making and implement sustainable business strategies, taking social and environmental causes into consideration.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>UK Food Production Threatened with Loss of Soil</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/UK-Food-Production-Threatened-with-Loss-of-Soil/4334.html</link>
													<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:30:25 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/UK-Food-Production-Threatened-with-Loss-of-Soil/4334.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[If the UK government wants to increase food production in the coming 20 to 30 years, it will have to stop soil erosion. Every year, over 2 million tons of topsoil gets eroded from forests and farms due to wind. If this persists in the coming years, government's efforts to increase food production will be at risk. Due to soi [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[If the UK government wants to increase food production in the coming 20 to 30 years, it will have to stop soil erosion. Every year, over 2 million tons of topsoil gets eroded from forests and farms due to wind. If this persists in the coming years, government's efforts to increase food production will be at risk. Due to soil erosion, the risk of floods has increased. This has not only reduced the production of food in many areas but also affected the country's efforts to bring down the rate of carbon emissions.<br />
<br />
With almost 200 years of industrial pollution and intensive farming, the quality of land in UK has degraded steadily. Even though the present situation cannot be regarded as critical as the condition of agricultural land in African and Asian countries, why take the risk? The problem of soil erosion is rising in underdeveloped countries due to poor farming practices, heavy usage of dangerous fertilizers and pesticides and overgrazing. The fact that conventional farming practices are affecting the quality of agricultural land all over the world, the concept of sustainable food is gaining more attention than ever.<br />
<br />
In the UK, development of transport infrastructure and housing has also put more pressure on the soil and the current rate of erosion costs 9 million pounds to the farmers annually. Due to climate change, soil is becoming prone to wind erosion due to hot and dry conditions and intense rainfall. The rate at which climate change is creating havoc across the world, countries will be required to produce twice as much food. But with soil erosion also increasing due to change in climate, it will be a challenge for countries make it possible.<br />
<br />
Approximately 10bn tons of carbon is present in the British soil and if this carbon is lost in the atmosphere due to soil erosion, it will result in emission equivalent to 50 times more the annual greenhouse gas emission in UK. In order to solve this issue, the government is encouraging farm owners to use organic farming methods and produce seasonal sustainable food.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Enterprise and Its Benefits</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterprise-Its-Benefits/4275.html</link>
													<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:37:27 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Enterprise-Its-Benefits/4275.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[If you thought social enterprises are only focused on social or environmental aims, think again. Besides the good work, such enterprises are also involved in the generation of revenue for further sustainability practices. As far as the management of 'triple bottom line' is concerned, social enterprise also face challenges s [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you thought social enterprises are only focused on social or environmental aims, think again. Besides the good work, such enterprises are also involved in the generation of revenue for further sustainability practices. As far as the management of 'triple bottom line' is concerned, social enterprise also face challenges similar to a private firm. However, bringing a positive change in the society remains the main focus for any non-profit organization.<br />
<br />
Social enterprises usually hire local people. Whether an individual is disabled, remained unemployed for a long term or belongs to a minority group, such enterprises bring a ray of hope in many lives. There are many people who leave their high profile jobs in multinational companies to join a social enterprise. The fact that it offers a platform where people can make a difference with the help of a flexible work environment has encouraged many people to take this step. These enterprises work on the concept of combining social goals and values with commercial practices.<br />
<br />
Companies that follow socially responsible practices cannot be considered a social enterprise. However, these enterprises have benefited with the sudden growth of the CSR movement. Governments all over the world need to realize the benefits of encouraging the growth of social enterprises in the economy. The profit made by social enterprises is invested back into development of the community and environmental sustainability. More awareness should be spread so that the consumers start buying more product and services that contribute to the welfare of the local communities.<br />
<br />
Even though traditional non-profit investment firms don't prefer investing in social enterprises, long term benefits of this sector can't be avoided. It not only helps in the generation of sustainable income sources and diversifies revenue streams but also helps in cutting down the dependency on donors. More social entrepreneurs are required who can recognize social problems and create successful ventures for bringing social change.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			<item>
													<title>Social Entrepreneurship in Singapore</title>
													<link>http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Entrepreneurship-in-Singapore/4204.html</link>
													<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:58:08 GMT</pubDate>	
													<author>Justmeans Staff</author>													
													<dc:creator>Justmeans Staff</dc:creator>		
													<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
													<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justmeans.com/Social-Entrepreneurship-in-Singapore/4204.html</guid>
													<description><![CDATA[The business community of Singapore has also joined the bandwagon to support the growth of social enterprises in the country. Companies all over the world are trying hard to recognize social problems and implement traditional principals of entrepreneurship to create ventures that will bring social change. A large number of  [...]]]></description>
													<content:encoded><![CDATA[The business community of Singapore has also joined the bandwagon to support the growth of social enterprises in the country. Companies all over the world are trying hard to recognize social problems and implement traditional principals of entrepreneurship to create ventures that will bring social change. A large number of successful social enterprises started in Europe and since then many countries across the globe have undertaken policies to support the growth of such enterprises at the local as well as national level.<br />
<br />
Studies show that the concept of social enterprises in the conservative and traditional society of Singapore is mostly focused on charity. They work on the pattern of spending a large amount of the donated money on people who benefitted. This leaves little resources for the organization. The National Kidney Foundation (NFK) scandal may have marred the growth of non-profit organizations in the country but hope still exists for emerging enterprises.<br />
<br />
A large number of social enterprises in Singapore have emerged from agencies involved in social services. Such agencies are involved in the diversification of their funding sources and offering sustainable services. With the importance of social enterprises rising all over the world, government in Singapore is also making efforts to tap its benefits for the growth of the economy.<br />
<br />
According to the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, such enterprises are beneficial in the fulfillment of various social and environmental causes. They cannot be considered a mere charity because social enterprises can also generate revenue. Funding agencies administered by the ministry are providing subsidies and grants to entrepreneurs in Singapore who are running social enterprises based on the work integration aspect. Traditional business start-up grants are also offering financial help to social enterprises in the country. Courses related to social entrepreneurship are being taken up by several business schools and universities in Singapore.]]></content:encoded>
											  </item>
			</channel>
</rss>