Does Ethical Consumerism Mean Always Supporting The Local Mom and Pop Store?
Posted On: July 15For me, the answer is ... sometimes.
Megan MacDonald recently wrote an interesting piece on Starbucks and their attempts at corporate social responsibility. She used to put companies in good or bad quadrants.
But recently, Megan says that she's become more aware of the good works Starbucks is doing, and attempting. She writes:
Now, personally, I've always had a weird soft spot for Starbucks. For one, many Starbucks pay their employees better than independent coffee houses and offer health benefits to employees who work a certain number of hours per week. Besides, I'm not convinced that Starbucks really does kill mom and pop coffee shops. In fact, many articles suggest that Starbucks actually HELPS independent coffee shops for a variety of reasons. Bryant Simon, a professor at Temple University argues that Starbucks helped to create a coffee culture which benefited independent coffee houses. Thus, while Starbucks increased the supply of coffee houses, they also increased demand. Now, I'm not an expert on coffee culture, but I do notice independent coffee houses everywhere I turn. So I'm hard-pressed to believe that Starbucks has really done much damage to the local mom and pop coffee house (especially compared to say, the independent bookstore which I believe really has suffered.)
Moreover, as a major company, Starbucks has the ability to make a real impact with its environmental practices. For example, Starbucks was the first company to develop a cup made of recycled content, and then it navigated the whole FDA approval process. Because of Starbucks' commitment to recycled content cups, other companies can now take advantage of this technology.
The truth is, Starbucks was once a small coffee shop itself. Knee jerk opposition to major companies isn't necessarily helpful. We shouldn't be against companies becoming successful. And while many companies lose their ethics as the grow more successful, Starbucks has largely stayed the ethical course.
So, this ethical consumer is happy to patronize Starbucks. She's also happy to patronize independent coffee shops. As it turns out, with coffee, you can have both your local mom and pop, and your big green corporation.
Megan MacDonald recently wrote an interesting piece on Starbucks and their attempts at corporate social responsibility. She used to put companies in good or bad quadrants.
But recently, Megan says that she's become more aware of the good works Starbucks is doing, and attempting. She writes:
Starbucks is far from alone in this category - many of today's most successful businesses left the same RIP trail of mom-and-pop shops in their wake. Like me, I know many people who aren't quite ready to forgive them for it. The truth is, these are the businesses of today - the major employers, the movers of the most products and those who serve the greatest amounts of people. It is thus important to both encourage, support and embrace their efforts at responsibility.
Now, personally, I've always had a weird soft spot for Starbucks. For one, many Starbucks pay their employees better than independent coffee houses and offer health benefits to employees who work a certain number of hours per week. Besides, I'm not convinced that Starbucks really does kill mom and pop coffee shops. In fact, many articles suggest that Starbucks actually HELPS independent coffee shops for a variety of reasons. Bryant Simon, a professor at Temple University argues that Starbucks helped to create a coffee culture which benefited independent coffee houses. Thus, while Starbucks increased the supply of coffee houses, they also increased demand. Now, I'm not an expert on coffee culture, but I do notice independent coffee houses everywhere I turn. So I'm hard-pressed to believe that Starbucks has really done much damage to the local mom and pop coffee house (especially compared to say, the independent bookstore which I believe really has suffered.)
Moreover, as a major company, Starbucks has the ability to make a real impact with its environmental practices. For example, Starbucks was the first company to develop a cup made of recycled content, and then it navigated the whole FDA approval process. Because of Starbucks' commitment to recycled content cups, other companies can now take advantage of this technology.
The truth is, Starbucks was once a small coffee shop itself. Knee jerk opposition to major companies isn't necessarily helpful. We shouldn't be against companies becoming successful. And while many companies lose their ethics as the grow more successful, Starbucks has largely stayed the ethical course.
So, this ethical consumer is happy to patronize Starbucks. She's also happy to patronize independent coffee shops. As it turns out, with coffee, you can have both your local mom and pop, and your big green corporation.
RELATED STORIES
| Good Business Planning | A Green Home Without the Pests 2 | Green living App to spark popularity in electric cars |
![]() ![]() |
Ruchira Shah 15 July 2009 Rodney, excellent points. And I completely agree, that ultimately we all have to decide on an appropriate yardstick. Thanks for your comments.
|
![]() |
Rodney North 15 July 2009 (Disclaimer: As my worker co-op, Equal Exchange, competes with Starbucks you can filter this as you wish.)
I agree one should not simplisticly believe that "big=bad" or that a corporation cannot genuinely change their conduct. For ex, Starbucks, Nike & Wal-Mart can all point to specific initiatives that really matter. But even firms like these often (usually?) represent a real mixed bag. To return to Starbucks - Ruchira's points are all relevant - but so is this: - they've a long record of illegal anti-union practices http://jm.ly/PoPrA1 - they've used their size, leverage & exclusivity deals with large real estate firms to block small competitors http://jm.ly/6F6gAc I could go on, but the gist is that one could reasonably conclude that their record, like so many, is still mixed. Each of us can decide what's the appropriate yardstick, what's 'enough" progress, & come to our own judgements. |
|
|
Ruchira Shah Justmeans News Writer |
Ruchira Shah was just your average young woman with a severe addiction to cute purses and high-end kitchen tools she never used, when one fine day, she decided to quit buying anything new. For a year. After twelve months of personal environmental experiments, Ruchi felt like she wanted to make a larger positive impact, so she decided to back to school, and is currently pursuing a masters degree at...















