stumbleupon
RSS
Sustainable Development  |  Sep 22, 2009 10:24 PM CDT

I'm passionate about a green, just socio-economy for everyone as our current system falls apart. I'm currently living in East Bay, California. When I'm not thinking about issues in international development -from melding top-down and bottom-up solutions for peace to joined-up solutions for the financial crisis and the green economy, you might find me hiking in the hills, live-blogging at a justm...

Justmeans Weekly News
sent to your inbox

Climate Funds - for what, exactly?

images-1What's worth at least several billions of dollars and it is still not enough money, no matter who you ask?

Climate funds. In case you haven't been paying attention (and not reading Dane's posts), the developed world might very well agree to pay for the irreversable damage that climate change will cause on developing countries. You know, like the Maldives - or bigger islands like Madagascar - going under water, increased desertification, etc. potential mass migration. At the very least, the need to diversify crops.

Turns out carbon-based development is pretty expensive, after all.

There's adaptation funds and there are mitigation funds - both private and public, leaving to billions of dollars.

Right now, there's a lot of debate about what are the best kinds of financial mechanisms to transfer this money. Multilateral, bilateral, conditionality, no conditionality, how engaged should the 'rich' be in the 'poor's use of that money (and how ensure it doesn't just line a lot of already deep pockets). Etc.

But here's the thing - what, exactly, are we funding? What works? What's really going to help people in Zanzibar (I love Zanzibar) adapt? What's going to really create a clean green economy? We know it will take a lot of capacity, and an 'enabling environment' (good policy), good investments, etc. Stop supporting coal, start supporing wind.

But beyond that and a host of other things, do we really know what to do? I've mentioned this theme before, but i've come back to it again after a colleague recently compared this to the challenge of trade. He (who knows much more than I do) said, we've been arguing for the need for developing countries to diversify exports for decades, but we haven't done it. It's not just that we duplicate our efforts, that we aren't as efficient as we'd like to be, that the financial mechanisms are not done right. It's that we don't seem to really know what needs to be done to diversify exports - how to really make it happen.

I've gotta admit that I'm worried about a repeat of that phenomenan right now. The stakes are high - and the potential for corruption and wasted money is also high. there are a lot of good intentions (and a few bad ones) but I haven't seen enough content yet to make me feel easy.

Maybe we should spend a lot more time on the what of these big multi billion dollar projects first.

Myriam Kaplan-Pasternak DVM
Myriam Kaplan-Pasternak DVM 10pm September 22
So much of this current enthusiasm reminds me of the reaction after the "We are the World" concert tour of Micheal Jackson in 1985. Projects...